patching...
Update: Get Patch in your inbox every morning. Sign up for our free daily newsletter! »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Mass Ave Corridor Project: Revised But Not Repaired

Resident feels town's updated Mass Ave plan fails to address safety, traffic concerns.

 

A civil engineering firm commissioned by Arlington resident Eric Berger has warned that the Town's revised Mass. Ave. plan may result in excessive backups at intersections along the corridor, leading to an increase in "cut through" traffic on adjacent neighborhood streets and prolonged emergency vehicle response times.

Dana Lynch, an engineer and president of  Civilworks, Inc., has reviewed the revised project plans, met with Town officials, and conducted a field visit to gain a better understanding of the conditions along the project corridor.  He summarized his findings in a report dated December 28, 2010.  A copy of Mr. Lynch's report is attached. 

"Mr. Lynch's findings confirm that this plan, if implemented, will be a disaster for the Town of Arlington," said Mr. Berger.  "What is being presented to us as a series of 'improvements' will actually make conditions on the corridor far worse than they already are." 

Using data derived from the Town's Functional Design Report submitted in November to the Mass. Department of Transportation, Mr. Lynch observes that the projected vehicle queue lengths are as long as 813 feet in some locations during peak hour commutes, which could "exacerbate" current traffic issues.  Mr. Lynch notes that the primary cause for the lengthy queues at the signalized intersections is the proposed reduction in through travel lanes. 

Mr. Lynch also calls attention to critical background research, data and information that is lacking in the Town's plan.  He suggests that the likelihood of cut-through traffic, the environmental impacts of the increased traffic congestion and the prolonged emergency response times all warrant further consideration – consideration that is absent in the Town's recent submission.

Mr. Lynch concludes that a four (4) lane section could adequately accommodate bicycle use while still providing reasonable vehicular movement without excessive queues. 

--Submitted by Eric Berger 

 

About this column: Submit Letters to the Editor as blog posts or by emailing Arlington Patch Editor John Waller at john.waller@patch.com. Please include your full name and the name of the street you live on.

Jeremy

1:40 am on Monday, January 17, 2011

Well, gee, the consultant told the client what the client wanted to hear. Never heard of that before!

But what continues to amaze me is that Eric Berger continues to pour away his life savings to wage a fight that's not only unwinnable but which defies logic and reason. Mr. Berger gives not a damn about anyone but himself: he certainly doesn't care about people being injured and terrorized every day on our streets.

He is a classic case study of the stubborn old guy resistant to change. You can show him the studies, the observations, take him for a tour -- heck, you can even implement the project -- but he will never be convinced by logic and reason. You learn to just ignore him and move on.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ed White

11:19 am on Tuesday, February 8, 2011

An independent consultant studied it and confirmed what we who live here already know. Its far more relevant than the 'studies' presented by the LSC. You have no right to make slanderous statements about Mr. Berger (a man I do not know) and show yourself to be immature and juvenile in doing so. He has fought for the concerns of the area residents, spending a lot of his own time and money as he clearly cares about this issue.

- Cutting down Mass. Ave. from 4 to 3 lanes in one small area will not help bike commuters much, at all. Arlington won't reduce the number of lanes in other areas of the town (why if it won't hurt?). Cambridge said it will not make a bike lane on the other side of Rt. 16. The entire proposed project is a waste of millions of dollars.

- The vast majority of residents are against it (see poll in Arlington Advocate) and the vast majority of area businesses are against it (http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2010/10/31/east_arlington_businesses_oppose_inclusion_of_bike_lanes_in_massachusetts_avenue_redesign/)

Logic and reason show that creating that bottleneck along Mass. Ave. will force commuters onto residential side streets. We have seen exactly that during those times that area had traffic reduced (Spring flooding, Autumn's Rt.16/Mass Ave roadway work, the current Winter narrowing due to snow). To deny that is either naive, self-serving BS, or wishful thinking to the point of it being nothing more than a daydream.

Leave a comment